Tech for Learning

Tech for Learning Write-Up
By: Jillian McSweeney and Blair Winters

After having read the DiBona and Kosslyn  articles we found that the authors are in agreement  in the belief that the internet is changing the way we think.  Not only that they also believe the internet influences our behaviors to the extent that we no longer do or think certain things. While Kosslyn is addressing this question by just looking at his own life, DiBona takes a societal perspective.

We found Kosslyn’s perspective to be limited and focused on how technological capabilities affect him personally. Kosslyn feels as if the internet has become an extension of himself. He likens the internet capabilities and information at our fingertips to that of a prosthetic limb. He sees the browser as  an extension of his memory, the internet an extension of his clairvoyance and judgment. Overall, Kosslyn claims he is a better thinker because the internet has been integrated into his “mental and emotional processing.” (p. 183)

DiBona took a societal perspective when discussing the question “Is the internet changing the way we think?” ’DiBona challenges the idea that the internet is making us more ignorant, referenced  the article “Is Google Making us Stupider?” by Nicholas Carr. DiBona affirms that we just have less unique thoughts considering how many people have access to sharing their ideas on the net and therefore it is more difficult (if not impossible)  to have an original idea. Additionally, he thinks that ignorant people will remain ignorant because they use the internet in a way that “aligns with their beliefs” (p. 225). DiBona reminds us that it is okay to let go of having so many unique thoughts, not that we shouldn’t contribute to having unique thoughts, but to be comfortable with using our high-functioning thoughts only in terms of things that matter most to us–family, work, etc.
We believe the authors’ perspectives have many implications for us as educators. We will need to think of the internet now almost as a detachable part of our brains, and even more so for our students. We will need to consider the impact of the internet on our thinking and our students’ thinking. Teachers must teach new literacy strategies because students have an access to a plethora of information online.  Since students may not have to commit this information to their long term memory, it then becomes important for teacher to teach them the skills that they need to navigate the scores of information online. Like the authors we feel that the internet has now become a place of collaborative learning. Teachers and students must utilize this collaborative space to create personal learning networks.To build off this students must be taught metacognitive skills such as being aware of and monitoring their learning goals. If students are like the authors and feel that the internet functions as an extension of their own memory then we believe teachers must develop new forms of assessment that take into account. We are left wondering if teachers should push against this idea of the internet an extension of memory and challenge students to develop their metacognitve rehearsal skills to commit this content information to long term memory.

References

Kosslyn, S.M. (2011). Social prosthetic system. Brockman, J. (Eds.) Is the internet changing
           the way you think? (182-183). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

DiBona, C. (2011) Ephemera and back again. (Eds.) .) Is the internet changing the way you
           think? (224-227). New York, NY: Harper Collin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s